Window FY2028–FY2033Scenario

CRF: Property Revaluation

Property taxes · General Fund · 6-year horizon

Every figure the reserves table quotes for this fund, derived again here line by line. The bar in a public meeting is not trust-the-software; it is check line four.

← all reserve funds · horizon 6 years10 years20 years

The answer

Holding today's deposit of $0 flat, this fund goes negative in FY2028. Closing the gap takes $34,358 a year more — or, with less price shock, a deposit that grows by $28,716 each year.

One recurrence, applied 6 times: balance = balance × (1 + 0.0%) + deposit − draws. Deposits are today’s figure, held flat. No solver and no goal-seek — the answers below are closed-form, so the same inputs always give the same figures.

Balance, both ways

negatives are shown, never floored — a fund going under is the finding
-$104k$47k$198k$349k$499kAt today’s deposit · FY2028 · -$28,716At today’s deposit · FY2029 · -$68,716At today’s deposit · FY2030 · -$68,716At today’s deposit · FY2031 · -$103,716At today’s deposit · FY2032 · -$103,716At today’s deposit · FY2033 · -$103,716With the gradual step-up · FY2028 · $0With the gradual step-up · FY2029 · $17,432With the gradual step-up · FY2030 · $103,580With the gradual step-up · FY2031 · $183,444With the gradual step-up · FY2032 · $327,024With the gradual step-up · FY2033 · $499,320FY28FY29FY30FY31FY32FY33
At today’s depositWith the gradual step-up

The roll-forward, line by line

every draw names its projects
YearDepositDrawsDrawn byBalanceStep-up depositBalance, stepped
Openingavailable, net of commitments, as of 31 Oct 2025$1,284$1,284
FY2028$0$30,000Revaluation first year — Town Wide — FY28 $15,000Revaluation first year — Town Wide — FY28 $15,000-$28,716$28,716$0
FY2029$0$40,000Revaluation Second Year — Town Wide — FY29 $20,000Revaluation Second Year — Town Wide — FY29 $20,000-$68,716$57,432$17,432
FY2030$0-$68,716$86,148$103,580
FY2031$0$35,000Revaluation Salvage $35,000-$103,716$114,864$183,444
FY2032$0-$103,716$143,580$327,024
FY2033$0-$103,716$172,296$499,320

Where the two answers come from

the same arithmetic, checkable on paper

The flat answer. The binding year is FY2029 — the year whose cumulative draws are hardest to cover. Through it:

Draws, FY2028–FY2029$70,000
less the opening balance− $1,284
less the deposits already planned− $0
Uncovered$68,716
spread over 2 equal annual additions$34,358 / yr

The gradual answer — the one with less price shock.Instead of the same amount every year, the addition grows: $28,716 in year one, $57,432 in year two, and so on. A deposit rising in year t contributes t steps by year T, so the divisor is 1 + 2 + … + 1 = 1rather than 1:

Uncovered through the binding year FY2028$28,716
divided by the triangle number 1$28,716 more each year

This is the recommendation the budget request prints: a gradual annual adjustment so that no year goes negative and there is less price shock. The Town raises a contribution once — it does not reset one. As projects shift, are removed, or reprice, both answers recompute; they cannot go stale.