Lighting upgrades
R-CIP-0175Cost by year
$80,000 total| Year | Expenditure type | Basis | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2034 | not stated | no basis | $80,000 |
Funding by source and year
more than one source per year is supported| Source | Class | FY34 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRF: Parking Facilities | Saved in advance | $80,000 | $80,000 |
| Residual against cost | 0 | $0 | |
Actual spend
manual entry or CSVNothing recorded. Actuals sit at the same grain as the funding above — by year and by source — so plan against actual works at the level the money was planned at.
Life cycle
| Useful life | 10 yrs |
| Condition | — |
| Last purchase | — |
| Previous investment | $275,000 |
| Next investment | $80,000 |
| Trade-in value | — |
| Replacement year | FY2034 |
The Town paid $275,000 last time and will pay $80,000 next — -71% more.
Classification
derived| Importance | — |
| Timing rationale | — |
| Project type | — |
Proposed by rule. Nobody has confirmed it, so nothing built on these values states a fact.
Movement window
Not set. How far this project can move does not exist in the register, and the scenario engine cannot move anything without it. This is a question for the department, not a default.
Narrative
The parking decks exposed to the weather require a surface covering much like a bridge deck to prolong their lives. Without a sealed membrane, precast concrete panels will rapidly deteriorate, requiring extensive repairs and loss in parking access.
A picture is recorded in the register at S:\databases\CIP database\photos\Parking\Parking Garage Protective Surface Membrane.jpg — upload it on the edit page to show it here.
Who pays
CRF: Parking Facilities — Parking fund, Parking Fund.