Greensboro Road, Great Hollow Road and Etna Road ownership transfer and upgrades
PZ-001Planning & ZoningNot statedGreensboro/Etna/Great Hollow RdGeneralIn the planclassification proposed
Cost by year
$15,950,000 total| Year | Expenditure type | Basis | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2030 | not stated | no basis | $15,950,000 |
Funding by source and year
more than one source per year is supported| Source | Class | FY30 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| To be determined | Unfunded | $15,950,000 | $15,950,000 |
| Residual against cost | 0 | $0 | |
Actual spend
manual entry or CSVNothing recorded. Actuals sit at the same grain as the funding above — by year and by source — so plan against actual works at the level the money was planned at.
Life cycle
| Useful life | 15 yrs |
| Condition | — |
| Last purchase | |
| Previous investment | — |
| Next investment | $15,950,000 |
| Trade-in value | — |
| Replacement year | FY2030 |
Classification
proposed| Importance | 2 |
| Timing rationale | Condition |
| Project type | Replacement or maintenance |
Proposed by rule. Nobody has confirmed it, so nothing built on these values states a fact.
Movement window
Not set. How far this project can move does not exist in the register, and the scenario engine cannot move anything without it. This is a question for the department, not a default.
Who pays
To be determined — Not identified, Not stated.